Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k
Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k is a DSA topic. In plain words you use it for a short Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k example in a short dry-run on paper. Don’t start with a slogan — start with that picture.
Smallest example: the smallest Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k example you can type. Type it, run it, and say what you see. If you can do that from memory, you know Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k.
From the example next to this theory: Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k — arrays give O(1) index access; matrices are arrays of arrays.
Trap: only saying “Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k” with no example. Fix that before you talk about advanced DSA.
Viva: what is Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k? Then show the smallest Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k example you can type. Then name the trap.
What is Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k? Show this: the smallest Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k example you can type. Trap: only saying “Given a n x n square matrix, find the sum of all sub-squares of size k x k” with no example.